No, not really. The assumption is toward the uploader having the appropriate permission if it appears to be an amateur image and it has not obvious signs of being a copyright violation. People have been in disagreement about whether images that are "controversial content" should be be held to a higher level of scrutiny. Some people say that we are be biased if we require a higher level of scrutiny for images of naked people. I disagree, but think that we really need to have a higher level of scrutiny for all images with identifiable people. By requiring model consent, we would solve a large part of the problems with the images on Commons.

Sydney Poore

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Sarah <slimvirgin@gmail.com> wrote:

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 05:17, Arnaud HERVE <arnaudherve@x-mail.net> wrote:
> IMO, the policies need to be tweaked so that admins like him will have
> better policy to work with.

Do we have specific Commons policies on voyeurism and invasion of privacy?

Sarah

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap