Great job! The discussions would have to be publicly accessible, to avoid an EEML type situation. Also, any "consensus" made there about external issues would not be applicable, due to the lack of open participation.

On Jan 6, 2015 7:35 PM, "Ryan Kaldari" <rkaldari@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Cool idea. I added some questions on the talk page.

Kaldari

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:35 PM, LB <lightbreather2@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, I don't know if I did it right, but per Sarah's and Siko's suggestion, I started this:


Just bare bones for now. I will work on it some more tomorrow.

Lightbreather

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap