I revisited Wikipedia as a newcomer to test the idea and newcomer experiences a year ago and didn't really see that.�� What I did experience was that it was complicated and that was discouraging. Part of the issue is that standards are stricter and quality expectations are such that newcomers are less likely to edit appropriately first time round, and therefore some kind of support or inculturation is needed that wasn't in 2004 - 05. Some knowledge is needed before (or as) you "edit this page" whereas before intuition was enough. Our approach to new joiners has not updated to reflect the fact that "just get on with it and find your own way" is no longer appropriate.
��
Specifically, we aim to encourage groups who are not net geeks, and therefore need a different kind of support and induction, and at the same time the project has got more quality conscious and there are more policies affecting what may and may not be done than there were in 2004 - 05.��
��
Both of these argue that our means of inducting joiners is hopelessly out of date, and it is this which causes newcomers to leave or be discouraged;�� what is perceived and sometimes described as a hostile environment is mostly a reflection of the divergence it involves.
��
FT2

On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Fred Bauder <fredbaud@fairpoint.net> wrote:

It doesn't work. Even now, if you show up on some projects, create a new
category, write a few new articles, you have to claw your way through
nominations for deletion and a blizzard of nonsense from regulars, based
on being "new". Not that I can't do it, but it is just wasted energy.

Fred

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l