Can anyone point to where this "troll" behavior happened? There don't seem to be a lot of specifics in this article, and I'm wondering if it's gender trolls (which are, alas, plentiful) or a culture clash between old editors and new ones over unfamiliar policies?  

On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Carol Moore dc <carolmooredc@verizon.net> wrote:

On 4/10/2015 6:33 PM, Siko Bouterse wrote:

This is the grant proposal referenced at the end of that article (currently under review as part of Inspire):
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/More_Female_Architects_on_Wikipedia

I remember NOT commenting on that one because I figured, who could have a problem with that?

How soon we forget that getting MORE women articles and editors was and remains controversial.

Banging head vs. wall....


CM

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap