From,
Emily

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Pete Forsyth <peteforsyth@gmail.com> wrote:

To me it seems beneficial to have a broadly accessible opportunity to formulate and answer questions about self-identified women on Wikipedia. The benefit is in empowering researchers and our community to pursue interesting questions -- but by definition, we don't know what the questions are yet :)

-Pete
[[User:Peteforsyth]]

On Sep 24, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Sarah Stierch wrote:

> On 9/24/12 3:37 PM, Emily Monroe wrote:
>> So. The implications of this. Good, bad, or does it really achieve anything?
>>
>> From,
>> Emily
>
> I'm not sure if there really is any good or bad implication, so to say. All it shows is that, in theory, there are approximately 1700 people in English Wikipedia who may identify as a female.
>
> I wonder how many of these editors are active.
>
> -Sarah
>
> --
> Sarah Stierch

> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap