Just a reminder, we have a conversation started here about it:


I also brought up the use of some templates used for gender studies. If we can start contributing to the wiki about this, that'd be wonderful!

Thanks everyone for your input and Jayen466 for taking the initiative,


On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Pharos <pharosofalexandria@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Daniel and Elizabeth Case
<dancase@frontiernet.net> wrote:
> I love the idea of having articles of gender concern in a one stop shopping
> space. Going through the NPOV collection is long, painful and is filled with
> lots of advertising articles for tech companies. Blarghhhh
> -Sarah
>    I agree with a gender-specific tag as well. NPOV is (by design) vague
> and, to me, not quite the fit we need as it is best applied to allegedly
> non-neutral use of language (in obvious cases of POV language, I just fix it
> ... there's no need to discuss). We ourselves already have {{globalize}}
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Globalize
> for the situation of articles reflecting only the experience of one
> particular region of the world or country. I don't see why gender bias
> couldn't be addressed the same way.

I was going suggest the Globalize template as well; it's a good model
of encouraging broader diversity (The examples and perspective in this
article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject) without the
boilerplate harsher tone of the stand NPOV template.


Gendergap mailing list

GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American Art
Sarah Stierch Consulting
Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising.