nice wiki-splaining - the problem with your thesis:
"What we don't need, however, is more feminists."

is labeling and the double standard of "civility enforcement"

as Djembayz said at Signpost:
"the rules on Wikipedia are not clear, the enforcement on disruptive behavior is arbitrary or non-existent. Online game players, vulgarians, and sea-lioning randos who congregate here can be as disruptive and outrageous as they wish, with impunity. They don't care, because they don't have to."

until the systemic bias in "civility enforcement" is dealt with, your thesis will be a dead letter with me.

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Sydney Poore <sydney.poore@gmail.com> wrote:

This part of the "we" of Wikipedians...me..wants feminist to edit Wikipedia, as well as people who want to solely add articles about women.

What I ask of you is to stand back so that those of us who are interested in creating an inclusive editing community can do so without being hindered. Because there is simply no way that Wikipedia's content can be neutral without a large and inclusive body of people creating it.

Warm regards,
Sydney Poore
User:FloNight

On Apr 9, 2015 10:27 AM, "Lukas Mezger (Wikipedia)" <lukas.mezger@wikipedia.de> wrote:
Dear readers of the gender gap mailing list,

My name is Lukas and I am a German Wikipedian (User:Gnom).

I recently wrote a blog post on Wikipedia and feminism and was encouraged to share it with this list.

As I am very new to the gender gap debate, I would appreciate your comments.
Regards,

Lukas Mezger

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap