I think a related point of concern is the tone that editors can take during some of these deletion discussions, although it is disturbing to have so many iconic feminist articles nominated for deletion at once (Pussy Riot, pregnancy from rape, Sandra Fluke). Some of the comments //just a party tool// //"fame" is "do you remember that person Rush called a slut?"// on the most recent DRV for Sandra Fluke (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2012_August_22#Sandra_Fluke) made me wish that there was some teeth in [[WP:CIVIL]].On 26 August 2012 15:16, Carol Moore DC <carolmooredc@verizon.net> wrote:
Questionable is being nice. "shitty" "sexist" "woman hating BS" is what is not very nice - in a wikipedia context, anyway... :-)On 8/26/2012 9:58 AM, Thomas Morton wrote:
Right now there are 3 questionable AfD's and various nominations, etc. Plus a bunch of Good article nominees and other listings.
On a "fostering friendly atmosphere" note; characterising actions as "questionable" is not very nice.
Tom
CM
Are you seriously implying I nominated the Tod Akin article for those reasons?
Tom