Dear Oliver, I believe it is constructive to reply you, for improving the quality of dialogue.  When I use the world `female-friendly space what I  is inclusive, constructive, a dialogue (following the rules of argumentation) that allows scientific articles, ea.   Take a look at these examples:   If we talk about a child-friendly hotel we refer to a family hotel where the space is adequate for every member of the family (we don’t talk about a kindergarten or about a niche). It is talked about a place that meets the challenge of a deficit or historical gap.   Other interesting examples are:   Women-friendly companies (for ex. Dell, HP, Abbot, ea. taking needs of working mothers)   Child-friendly justice (initiative by the European Council for giving better access to justice)   When I talked about historical gaps (I talked from an historical point of view and not about Wikipedia)... I have the impression that my words in your reply were unintentionally modified and lost the original sense of the proposal. If you read with more time and without adding meanings or changing words my suggestions, it would be better for improving them. It is about maximise efforts and get better results.