Hi Sandra,You may find these educational materials helpful when you think about designing your program. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Systemic_bias_workshop_kit.pdfSeeing some consistent programming with an organization would be great! Good luck!-EmilyOn Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Sarah Stierch <sarah.stierch@gmail.com> wrote:The only thing I can think of is the fembot/femtech programs that have women editing in a myriad of things - education programs, events etc but its not a formal thing. Myself, Adrianne and Alex have been involved but again its not "formal"
The Europeana fashion is sort what you are going for...or Wikimedia UK with their relationship with the Royal society...but it's more seasonal than ongoing...
I'd love to see more formalized things.
On Nov 19, 2014 11:57 AM, "Sandra Fauconnier" <sandra.fauconnier@gmail.com> wrote:Yes, I mean an ongoing thing - not just one or two edit-a-thons.
Not really a Wikipedian in Residence project - more like a long-term commitment and project in which several activities take place over a longer time, with maybe several Wikipedia volunteers involved.
Perhaps Europeana Fashion comes close??
Greetings, Sandra
> On 19 Nov 2014, at 16:18, Sarah Stierch <sarah.stierch@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Do you mean more like an ongoing thing? Not just once a year? (Or twice)
>
> Like a wikipedian in residence....sort of?
>
> Many of us collaborate with organizations and groups - often the same..to do this kind of stuff but not many people have sat in a role and did consistent programming...yet.
>
> Sarah
>
> On Nov 19, 2014 12:38 AM, "Sandra Fauconnier" <sandra.fauconnier@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> (This is still in the making, so no solid promises or plans yet.)
>
> In the Netherlands a small group of representatives of organisations that deal with women’s history is seriously brainstorming about a longer-term project to represent the Dutch women’s history better on Wikipedia. Together with a few other Dutch Wikipedians, I’m brainstorming together with them (and will probably help them during the actual process when the project takes off).
>
> At this moment, our plan is to narrow our focus to the subject of Dutch second-wave feminism and to ‘recruit’ university docents to do Wikipedia-oriented courses with students. We hope that a few enthusiastic university teachers will teach a term course on second-wave feminism (probably one term of the 2015-16 academic year), and that students will be asked to write or improve Wikipedia articles as an assignment.
>
> My question to this list is the following:
> The organisations’ representatives are curious whether there are any earlier, similar projects that we can refer to, and learn from. Are there?
> I mean: projects in which local Wikipedians have worked together with local feminist organisations, or women’s history organisations, in order to structurally improve content on Wikipedia.
> I did a bit of searching around on the various Gender Gap project pages (I admit: superficially) but couldn’t find any so far. I’m aware of the Art+Feminism edit-a-thons.
>
> In any case - all suggestions and tips are very welcome.
>
> Many thanks! Sandra (User:Spinster)
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap