I've been out of touch with the world for most of the last week, but
I'm extremely disappointed to see the only active arbitrator to
comment on that discussion so far just asked for a tl;dr when given a
two hour long video of free advice from a leading expert in online
harassment issues. Almost every case arb takes deals with harassment
in one form or another - given the time they spend discussing
trivialities, let alone drafting cases and on private lists, I would
hope that no arbitrator (none of the sitting ones have formal training
in dealing with online harrassment, AFAIK, although I may be missing
someone) would refuse to spend a much smaller amount of time hearing
one of the top experts n the subject talk about it. If you can't
accept a two hour time committment, you probably shouldn't be an arb.
----
Kevin Gorman
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Fæ <faewik(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Links:
1.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kS-Y-FuzAH4&t=85m30s
2.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee#Comments…
Folks may be interested in watching the Q&A session at the recent
WikiConference USA where gender and harassment was discussed for about
45 minutes.[1] It makes for an interesting summary of how Arbcom is
perceived with regard to handling harassment cases, and the types of
harassment of significant concern for our community.
This has been raised on the Arbcom noticeboard[2], it will be
interesting to see how many current Arbcom members make a public
comment, or indeed if they are perfectly happy with the way Arbcom
currently works, or not.
Fae
--
faewik(a)gmail.com
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap