It is very interesting to follow you in your careful interpretation of data.

If the available data can provide interesting information, I suggest to take into account the Spanish Wikipedia (it is not on the given data). UNESCO made several studies on gendergap and determined that Latin America (and probably Spain) is the region with less gendergap at scientific level, followed by Europe-North America, Africa and finally Asia.

Patricia

--- On Fri, 2/11/11, Andreas Kolbe <jayen466@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Andreas Kolbe <jayen466@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Fwd: Gender preference
To: "Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects" <gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org>
Date: Friday, February 11, 2011, 2:23 PM

--- On Fri, 11/2/11, Ism Woonpton <woonpton@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Ism Woonpton <woonpton@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Fwd: Gender preference
> To: "Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects" <gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org>
> Date: Friday, 11 February, 2011, 16:18
> Please, please, please be careful
> here.  The data offered here answer
> the question "How many editors self-identify on Wikipedia
> as female?"
> not the question "How many females edit Wikipedia?" There's
> a very
> important difference, and these numbers should not be
> generalized
> beyond the small percentage of editors who give their
> gender in
> "preferences" on Wikipedia.  In other words, of the
> 280,285 people (2%
> of all editors) who identify their gender,  16%
> self-identify as
> female.   It is very probable that women who
> self-identify as women
> (and who are interested  enough to say so in
> "preferences") differ in
> important ways from women editors as a whole.  To use
> that number as a
> proxy for "How many of the 13+million editors are
> female?"  would be a
> serious mistake.  The survey with over 100,000
> responses, which was
> purported to be anonymous (although I know of at least one
> woman who
> refused to give her gender even on that survey because she
> didn't
> trust the assurance of anonymity) is a much more valid
> estimate of
> female participation.  Not perfect by any means, but
> certainly better.
>
> The only thing these numbers tell *me* is that editors on
> Wikipedia,
> male and female, aren't terribly interested in identifying
> themselves
> by gender.  I wouldn't draw any conclusion, even
> tentative, from it
> beyond that, or use this as a number to (shudder)
> "extrapolate from."
> If you're going to extrapolate, you need something solid
> to
> extrapolate from.
>
> Woonpton




Spoken like a true statistician, and absolutely correct. :)

Andreas




> On 2/11/11, paolo massa <paolo@gnuband.org>
> wrote:
> > I posted on my blog the table. See
> > http://www.gnuband.org/2011/02/10/percentage_of_men_and_women_on_different_wikipedias/
> >
> > Amir left a comment saying that the User: namespace in
> Russian is
> > translated into the equivalent of User_male: (I guess
> if the user set
> > male in the preferences as gender) and User_female:
> (if female in the
> > preferences).
> >
> > Do you know if this happens in other wikipedia as
> well?
> > In Russian Wikipedia, if gender is not set, how User:
> is rendered?
> > With the male equivalent or there is a neutral form?
> >
> > P.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Joseph Reagle <joseph.2008@reagle.org>
> > wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, February 09, 2011, Oliver Keyes
> wrote:
> >>> So, depressingly, it looks like en-wiki is
> actually doing the best! :P.
> >>> Any
> >>> chance we could have that broken into
> percentages?
> >>
> >> My preliminary tabulation shows WP in the middle.
> Also, oddly, a lot of
> >> Russians apparently gender declare. One of the odd
> things with the survey
> >>  from which the 13% is derived is how many
> Russians participated. Maybe
> >> the really like to identify with WP?
> >>
> >> en.wikipedia :  2.01% declared: 233312 men; 46973
> women; women are 16.76%
> >> de.wikipedia :  3.47% declared:  35726 men;
>  4800 women; women are 11.84%
> >> fr.wikipedia :  2.16% declared:  18556 men;
>  3054 women; women are 14.13%
> >> commons      :  2.26% declared:  27980 men;
>  5070 women; women are 15.34%
> >> sr.wikipedia :  2.66% declared:   1666 men;  
> 414 women; women are 19.90%
> >> ru.wikipedia : 16.80% declared:  80491 men; 23750
> women; women are 22.78%
> >> pl.wikipedia :  3.64% declared:  12106 men;
>  2999 women; women are 19.85%
> >> nl.wikipedia :  2.92% declared:   8977 men;
>  1781 women; women are 16.56%
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Gendergap mailing list
> >> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Paolo Massa
> > Email: paolo AT gnuband DOT org
> > Blog: http://gnuband.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gendergap mailing list
> > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>


     

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap