Perhaps the conversation should be more about equal representation of gender in articles like this...

Just a thought :)

Sarah

Sent via iPhone - I apologize in advance for my shortness or errors! :)

On Apr 27, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Emily Monroe <emilymonroe03@gmail.com> wrote:

While the picture could be described as somewhat pornographic, I'll 

have to agree with previous participants in this email conversation. This article IS porn-related, so a pornographic cartoon can be used to illustrate it, per WP:NOTCENSORED.

From,
Emily

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Carol Moore DC <carolmooredc@verizon.net> wrote:

NO need to censor it. Just do a second one with bushier eyebrows and a goatee and put that up instead :-)

On 4/27/2012 1:50 PM, Béria Lima wrote:

Katrin, I hate to be captain obvious here, but: Do you know that "cun shot" is a porn related term right? Only used in Porn related articles (see related articles)? And that what is in the article isn't a picture, but a illustration?

I do agreed when people complained about the naked gardening article and pic, because isn't a sex related article. But this IS a sex related article, not only, this one is a PORN related article. Is not like someone will fall there accidentally by looking for Jesus or Santa. Therefore, I don't see the reason to censor the article.
 ____
Béria Lima

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap