On 2/1/12 3:35 PM, emijrp wrote:
No. You just want to write a book with no rigor.

Not sure why I didn't think of this the first time, but, like Beria and I both said - let's be bold and while we hope for input from Laura, I'm sure people would be welcome to improve on their pages, like I hope I did in the US section. (I did remove the material related to top articles and so forth, but it was returned!)

And of course, like all wiki's, there is a talk page for each country that Laura has listed, so you can even craft conversation and ideas there. And of course, I do encourage constructive conversation here on this mailing list (more than just an obtuse one liner!).  (For example, here is the US talk page: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiWomenCamp/FAQ/Perspectives/United_States)

Thanks Beria for encouraging others to participate on Meta! Looking forward to seeing the materials on Meta continue to grow into something really valuable for the community!  I think if we can focus on what people are doing, it'll show us where we can place ourselves in the role of Wikimedia, and also encourage us to examine what people aren't doing. Sometimes just focusing on that 9% can be a downer, you know? :)

-Sarah


--
Sarah Stierch
Wikimedia Foundation Community Fellow
>>Support the sharing of free knowledge around the world: donate today<<