Hi Fae,

Opabinia regalis and I both identified ourselves as bisexual women on our question pages. Hope that's useful.

-Emily

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Fæ <faewik@gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks for highlighting it. Unfortunately there are a lot of pages to
wade through with user questions, so things like being a woman or
identifying as LGBT are handy things to mention in passing in the
candidate statement. It certainly would influence my vote...

I agree, as this is a critical part of the election this year it would
be interesting to see an aggregation of gender and LGBT stats, or a
"diversity index", for candidates and the eventual Arbcom elected, and
to see this compared to past years. Perhaps if someone is writing up a
Signpost article they could include this small bit of research? ;-)

Fae

On 24 November 2015 at 04:42, LFaraone <wikipedia@luke.wf> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 at 04:21 Fæ <faewik@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> This year sees a much more interesting selection of candidates, though
>> a lack of any *openly* LGBT candidates as far as I could tell from the
>> statements.
>
>
> Several candidates (myself included) mentioned our queerness in our
> responses to the demographics questions asked by some editors. I don't know
> if there's been any on-wiki aggregation of that data, however.
>
>   -- Luke // LFaraone

--
faewik@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap