hmmm. okay. you can delete that part if you want. this is just a rough
draft, and i'm assuming together we can come up with something that is
accurate and positive. thanks for pointing that out pete.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Pete Forsyth <peteforsyth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mar 24, 2011, at 10:11 AM, Sandra ordonez wrote:
What language can we include so that we feel safe
about sharing personal
stories here, or opinions?
Hi Sandy and all,
I love the Manifesto, and hope it will continue to evolve.
I have a sort of general concern though, about the way we think and talk
about "safety." I should say up front, I don't have a solution in mind --
but I think it's important to think this through carefully.
Of course we want to establish a safe space, but I think we have a
responsibility not to talk about safety in terms that go beyond what we can
reasonably provide. And our list which is publicly archived. Even if we are
diligent about dealing with bad faith *participation* on the list, we have
absolutely no ability to exclude anyone from reading the list, or linking to
or commenting on it elsewhere on the Internet.
As it stands right now (with open sign-up and public list archives), I
don't feel great about putting emphasis on encouraging people to voice
frustrations or, more generally, to feel safe. It doesn't seem responsible.
-Pete
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
--
Sandra Ordonez
Web Astronaut
"Helping you rock out in the virtual world."
*www.collaborativenation.com*