Thank you Anne. I responded to you and Sarah here: 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:LeoRomero#3D2DO 

in Community, to end this shameful Gender Gap immediately,
i remain, truly yours,

Leo
 
Today's Topics:

   1. Cooperation Index & Table at the Gender Gap project       page on
      Wikipedia en (Leo Romero)
   2. Re: Cooperation Index & Table at the Gender Gap project page
      on Wikipedia en (Risker)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 23:42:13 -0800
From: Leo Romero <leo@leoromero.org>
To: gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Gendergap] Cooperation Index & Table at the Gender Gap
        project page on Wikipedia en
Message-ID:
        <CAO41Z+gTS3FhBpX+svuPc8MshSF-vU7jyzqf_hj-wph2ovGFRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi there - Whenever you have 5-10 mins to spare, could you please see the
page linked below? It should explain itself, since it's designed for
newbies and returnees (like me). If it doesn't, would you mind fixing it,or
letting us know your suggestions on the Talk page? - Thanks and Mabuhay! -
Leo

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Countering_systemic_bias/Gender_gap_task_force/3D2Do
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/attachments/20151219/3e83c1a0/attachment-0001.html>
 
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 15:04:05 -0500
From: Risker <risker.wp@gmail.com>
To: "Addressing gender equity and exploring ways to increase the
        participation of women within Wikimedia projects."
        <gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Cooperation Index & Table at the Gender Gap
        project page on Wikipedia en
Message-ID:
        <CAPXs8yR7XQMePj8OZwoqdKY3LCuQVusZmTwBb+Ye2=s391up2w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

What kind of information, exactly, are you trying to collect there?  Is it
"contributions" to those policies?  In which case...you're not helping.
I'm going to be blunt, constant upheaval at policy pages is not what GGTF
is for, and treating policy discussions like games is not a good idea.
Gamifying policy discussion?

Risker/Anne