Advocate for what exactly? There nothing ethically wrong in ensuring we establish precedent using an equal sample space rather than cases chosen because they are about a Women's march in the news. The most common interpretation of that would be advocating for fairness in approach.
Fae
On 30 January 2017 at 12:05, JJ Marr jjmarr@gmail.com wrote:
Two wrongs don't make a right and using this mailing list to advocate for that crosses a line.
On Jan 30, 2017 05:11, "Fæ" faewik@gmail.com wrote:
Link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Activist_G...
I am concerned that amongst the many videos of talks and speeches where people refer to their notes, it is these recent Women's march videos that have been targeted to set an unusual precedent and are being vigorously argued for deletion, along with some parallel drama-mongering on Jimmy Wales' talk page. Perhaps it would be healthier to put up an equal number of comparative videos of men talking at WMF events, using the same arguments about prepared notes needing to be published before the video can be considered correctly released; or would that be too pointy?
Fae
faewik@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap