No that was not funny. ;) I really had to completely redo the CSS.

Still I would not think that it is necessary to release a new skin. I guess that's the versioning is there for to state the difference and this is there semver comes into play. So a break was to be expected even if you do not like it. ;)

Another thing: I just realized that there is already a Foundation 6. Is this something to expect for Foureground 3.x?

Cheers

Karsten

Am 19.04.2017 um 17:35 schrieb Tom:

The most troubling thing however is that I more or less heavily adapted the CSS of the sites using foreground and the breakage here is pretty massive (beyond recognition - I thought I was accessing a different website which is having many worries).

Lol, but I know it's not funny! There are some changes in the navbar and the styling of it. There must be code changes to CSS if someone wants to maintain the same look. The drop-down menu heights are taller and the selectors for colors are a little different.

It's had me thinking the past couple of days if we should release a completely new skin called ForegroundV2. This way someone could install it turn it on and see the differences. It would be a bit of a pain trying to maintain two versions so I hope just good documentation can solve this.

There are definitely some great benefits to Foundation 5. Medium screen class, native on hover of page actions, data-options of elements, etc.

Thanks for all your help too!!!

Tom
_______________________________________________
Foreground mailing list
Foreground@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foreground