On 26 March 2013 18:37, Steven Walling
<swalling(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Oliver Keyes <okeyes(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
I got one too. My question (asked on IRC, but throwing out here for wider discussion):
what's the rationale with directing people to the non-secure site? Did Ops object to
https?
For reference: our current emails direct to vanilla HTTP, e.g. non-Echo stuff. It might
be a more general request to make of Ops.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Fabrice Florin
<fflorin(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Mar 26, 2013, at 5:43 PM, Oliver Keyes wrote:
On 27 March 2013 00:37, Fabrice Florin <fflorin(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Thanks, Oliver.
I would give the 'HTTPS' feature a lower priority than getting Echo deployed on
time. This is something we can revisit after we are deployed, I don't view it as a
blocker for now.
Sure, I don't think it's a blocker at all. But it's not a particularly big
change, either ;p.
Cool. I just want us focused on the most important features first, so we can ship on time
;o)
On Mar 26, 2013, at 7:49 PM, Luke Welling WMF <lwelling(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
The easy way of changing to https looks to be adding a
single character to the definition of $wgServer in LocalSettings.php.
$wgServer is used everywhere, I believe even for reader access, so I vote strongly against
this change. ;-)
Normally the correct way of handling this is WebRequest::detectServer() which uses the
protocol of the user's browsing state (if https, then https). I take this is a problem
because the messages are decoupled between the event trigger and the recipient?
BTW, this sort of mediawiki discussion should probably be on a lis where much more
experienced mediawiki devs can answer, so I'm moving it there.
That would change it in a few other places though, so sounds like 1 second of editing and
1 day of testing.
We could hack it in just for Echo, but that would either be hacky and specific to
targeted installations or break on installs that don't have identical http and https
urls.
BTW, my opinion is I'm okay with using http://... ($wgServer) right now for release
and just capturing this request as a bug in bugzilla or in Trello for now.