On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Matthew Flaschen
<mflaschen(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
I agree these tools are problematic for this reason.
I understand why
some people currently choose to use them, but the Foundation should
investigate free alternatives that can meet our projects' needs.
I'll reply in a bit more detail later, but just a quick note that most
of the open source agile PM tools are pretty terrible, sadly. I've
seen one that's potentially decent, Fulcrum, which is a Pivotal clone
and may merit some investigation:
http://wholemeal.co.nz/projects/fulcrum.html
--
Erik Möller
VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation