I added product designers (i.e. anyone making software for users) as a
I am very very very very very very skeptical of this whole workflow
language idea. What began as the need for better localization of tools like
PageCuration, and a vague but promising idea about using ContentHandler to
help give pages more structure, has morphed in to a convoluted and
over-architected idea. And that goes for whether the particulars come from
fundraising or product or design etc.
I could go on more of a rant here, but suffice it to say I think we're
missing a compelling rationale for why we need a workflow language. I
commented as much on the Talk page.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Terry Chay <tchay(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
*From: *Adam Wight <awight(a)wikimedia.org>
*Subject: **Rough draft of Workflow design*
*Date: *September 10, 2013 5:11:56 PM PDT
*To: *Maryana Pinchuk <mpinchuk(a)wikimedia.org>rg>, fr-tech <
fr-tech(a)wikimedia.org>gt;, Terry Chay <tchay(a)wikimedia.org>
I've outlined some thoughts about how to design a workflow engine, at
My main concern is that we produce something that is appropriate for
general on-wiki use, and for Fundraising's internal needs.
EE mailing list