Considering people deliver warnings via Huggle etc to IP editors, perhaps allowing a thanks to be sent wouldn't be such a bad idea.

I realise it's purely anecdotal, but if it was available I reckon I'd use 'thanks' for anonymous users making changes as often as logged in editors.


On 21 May 2014 23:35, David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com> wrote:
If only I was a developer of any sort ;-)


On 21 May 2014 21:56, Fabrice Florin <fflorin@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hi David,

I am delighted that you are interested in extending the Thanks feature we released last year, so it can be used to thank more users.

I am no longer working on this project, but am not aware of any changes that would make it easier to thank anonymous users: IP addresses are still as unreliable now as they were a year ago.

But I have Cc:d Danny Horn, the new product manager for core features like Flow and Notifications, so he can chime in from his viewpoint.

Personally, I would love to see the Thanks feature be used even more than it is today, as it seems like such a civilized way to show appreciation to each other :)

Cheers,


Fabrice


On May 20, 2014, at 7:56 AM, David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com> wrote:

On 20 May 2014 15:35, Strainu <strainu10@gmail.com> wrote:

I've recently noticed the "Thank you" feature is only available for
signed-in users, while anons cannot receive "thank yous". The
anonymous users are often the ones that would need encouraging the
most, so it would make sense to me to have this feature available to
them too.
Are there significant technical problems against such a change?



I asked for this on the editor engagement list too. Fabrice said: [1]

"Sadly, we couldn't make this feature available for anonymous users,
as you have to be registered to receive notifications right now. This
is because IP addresses cannot be trusted to deliver notifications to
the users they were intended to. I don't expect we'll change that
anytime soon. We should all encourage anonymous user to register if
they want to enjoy the same benefits as other members."

Fabrice, is this still the case? Are there ways around this?

* I suppose session cookies for anons just to possibly thank them is a
bit excessive.
* Could limit "thanks" to a short time after the edit (limiting either
sending or receiving).

Any other ways we could implement this with minimal false-positives on
thanking people? If that's considered a problem :-)


- d.

[1] http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/ee/2013-July/000525.html

_______________________________

Fabrice Florin
Product Manager
Wikimedia Foundation






_______________________________________________
EE mailing list
EE@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ee




--
Richard Nevell
Assistant Office Manager
Wikimedia UK
+44 (0) 20 7065 0753

Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).

Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.