Thank you Vahid for sharing with the education mailing list WMIL article
assessment. We also have another grading tool:
Please feel free to contact me if you need any further information.
Kind regards, Michal
*Regards,*
*Michal Lester,*
*Executive DirectorWikimedia Israel*
*http://www.wikimedia.org.il <http://www.wikimedia.org.il/> *
*972-50-8996046 ; 972-77-751-6032 *
2016-10-08 1:43 GMT+03:00 Vahid Masrour <vmasrour(a)wikimedia.org>rg>:
Israel has developed quite an advanced model to assess
student work in
Wikipedia. I recommend you look at their classroom-tested work here:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2b/Article_
Assessment_for_Student_Assignments_%E2%80%93_For_Teacher.pdf
This guide also written by WMIL may also be of interest (and used as a
starting point for your own adaptation?):
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/84/WMIL_-_A
_Guide_to_Writing_Articles_about_Awards_Winning_Scientists.pdf
Best regards,
Vahid.
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Kleefeld, John <john.kleefeld(a)usask.ca>
wrote:
Hello all:
I’d like build a catalogue or inventory of assessment (grading) rubrics
for Wikipedia assignments, ranging from the simplest assignments to the
most complex. I’m not referring to a grading structure (10% for this, 50%
for that, etc.), but to a set of objective criteria for assessing the
contributions within that structure. Usually, this will be in a
two-dimensional format with “descriptors” that assess proficiency in
various “dimensions” (see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Rubric_(academic)), though other formats are possible. I’ve reviewed
various materials, including the WikiEdu grading page (
http://ask.wikiedu.org/questions/scope:all/sort:activity-
desc/tags:grading/page:1/) and found some useful guidance at pages 14-19
of the Case Studies document. But I’d like to see if any of this has been
translated into the kinds of rubrics I’m thinking of. I’m open to seeing
what you’ve done in any discipline, even if it doesn’t follow the format
I’m describing.
Apologies for any duplication between this list and the education-request
list.
John Kleefeld
Associate Professor, College of Law
University of Saskatchewan
15 Campus Drive
Saskatoon SK S7N 5A6
tel: (+1) 306.966.1039
email: john.kleefeld(a)usask.ca
skype: johnkleefeld
twitter: @johnkleefeld
web:
http://law.usask.ca/find-people/faculty/kleefeld-john.php
Read my most recent article, co-authored with former student Kate
Rattray, on editing Wikipedia for law school credit: *http://ssrn.com/abstract=2729241
<http://ssrn.com/abstract=2729241>.*
Also, just published—“Contributory Fault at 90,” my book chapter in Quill
& Friel’s *Damages and Compensation Culture: *
http://www.bloomsbury.com/au/damages-and-compensation-cultur
e-9781849467971.
_______________________________________________
Education mailing list
Education(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
--
Vahid Masrour
Community Capacity Manager, Wikipedia Education Program
vmasrour(a)wikimedia.org
https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Education
_______________________________________________
Education mailing list
Education(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education