Just I had a meeting with an it acadamic professionalist, the things got from Wikipedia are not accepted as valid. Because they say that enyone can edit wikipedia. That's the reason.But I said to that references are given to each points there and temples such as citation needed are put in WIKIPEDIA. What do you think about this? I am from srilanka.

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:15 AM, Kleefeld, John <john.kleefeld@usask.ca> wrote:

Colleagues, here is my fifth blog post, the first of a two-part set.

 

WikiProjects, Article Importance, and Article Quality: An Intimate Relationship (1/2) http://bit.ly/2lH9hjJ

 

And here are the links to the previous four, in reverse chronological order:

 

Wikipedia’s Gender Bias – and What Your Students Can Do About It http://bit.ly/2kOkSMC

What Does It Mean to Say That “Anyone Can Edit” Wikipedia? http://bit.ly/2jqMV5y

How Students Are Learning Medicine and Collaborative Skills, And Transforming Wikipedia http://bit.ly/2jt5fH7

The Wikipedia Manifesto http://bit.ly/2jGlAc1

 

Yours truly,

 

John Kleefeld

Associate Professor, College of Law

2017 Teaching Fellow, Gwenna Moss Centre for Teaching Effectiveness

University of Saskatchewan

15 Campus Drive

Saskatoon SK  S7N 5A6

 

tel:          (+1) 306.966.1039

email:    john.kleefeld@usask.ca

skype:    johnkleefeld

twitter: @johnkleefeld

web:       http://law.usask.ca/find-people/faculty/kleefeld-john.php

mission: http://www.usask.ca/leadershipteam/documents/president/MissionVisionValues.pdf

 

 

_______________________________________________
Education mailing list
Education@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education

--

Best.
Shriheeran Logeswaran.

_______________________________________________
Education mailing list
Education@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education