On 27 Mar 2015 2:11 am, "Quim Gil" <qgil(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:07 AM, Moushira Elamrawy <
melamrawy(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
>
> > The banner itself is currently driving traffic to the userpage (which
itself needs further iteration)
I think offering a link to the history of the page is better.
We already do.
The last editor is not that relevant (and quite often
it will be a bot),
Yet more people click on it for whatever reason:
http://mobile-reportcard.wmflabs.org/#other-graphs-tab.
but the history gives you a quick glance to the fact
that this page has
been updated by several people at different points of time for
reasons
summarized in the description of each edit. From there you can click to
user profile pages if you wish.
The history monile page is ok already today. It would benefit from a
summary at the
top that could provide interesting information to newcomers
and regular editors alike, i.e.
Yeh that's not a bad idea - Phabricator task?
This page was created on DD-MM-YYYY and has been edited N times by N
registered
volunteers and N anonymous users.
Improve it anonymously Log in / Register
(((for logged in users we could simply show the edit pencil icon)))
More generally we really need to pay attention to our data and rely on it
more. I see far too many changes across the site based on guesswork and
personal preferences and that's an anti pattern we need to reverse. Now we
have a ux research team and ways to a/b test we can test different designs
and see if they generate the correct behaviour. In this case I hope we will
test to see if last modified at the top is driving more edits than putting
it at the bottom. _______________________________________________