Articles Vs Pages Vs <insert word here>
####################################
Recently all instances of the word 'article(s)' was switched with
'content pages' / 'pages'. This problem keeps recurring in our design
and is starting to become a nuisance. I see both sides here - 3rd
parties and even our own projects use our software in a different way
- sometimes pages are articles, sometimes they are definitions,
sometimes destinations etc etc.

However the word 'content page' and page is extremely ambiguous and
can be confusing.

One good example is the watchlist view on mobile - it provides the
ability to filter feeds by namespace:

This i18n change changed the word 'article' to 'content pages'. In
this context it makes no sense. Programmatically what it actually
means is show me only pages from the 'Main namespace' but to a reader
the word 'articles' is arguably more understandable than 'content
pages'. I would actually like us to continue using 'articles' but
explore ways other instances can customise this - e.g. switch the word
'articles' to other words based on what their project is about. It
would be nice for wikibooks to use the word 'books' for instance, and
wikitionary 'words' or 'definitions'. Is this feasible and worth
exploring? I feel like using the word pages at the benefit of
generalisation seriously damages the benefit of clear and easy to
understand language.