I want to try to step out of my role for a moment and think about it from a user's perspective: 
To me the button separation seems rather arbitrary in most current use-cases, that I've seen so far. If it's a multistep dialog/action connected, will the user understand that after using the green button several times and therefore finish his task more easily? If a multi-step action is needed, there's common agreement, that 
Providing different button colors between the steps and providing one at the final step doesn't provide much feedback and it's hard to grasp without explaining it upfront and in-detail.
As we're already providing primary buttons and secondary ("neutral") buttons, I think we should consolidate the two different primary (progressive & constructive) ones in order to give user's a clearer focus on what's the primary action to get "bigger" tasks done.

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Gergo Tisza <gtisza@wikimedia.org> wrote:
​One problem I have run into recently is that for a complex form you are not necessarily able to tell which step is the last. E.g. after you submit the login form and MediaWiki verifies your credentials, depending on your user settings you might or might not be presented with a two-factor challenge; so submitting the user name and password might or might not be the last step of the form. (Arguably login should not be constructive in the first place, but it is now. In any case, similar problems could be present with the user registration form, which does create something.)

Personally, I agree with Bartosz that having four button types (five or more if we include silent buttons) just makes the interface confusing.

_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
Design@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design