Indeed. See also the bugs where these were set to use <b> and <i>
And subsequent bugs asking for a change to <em> and <strong> which were
marked as INVALID / WONTFIX.
Peter
On 30 November 2013 04:35, Bartosz Dziewoński <matma.rex(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 13:22:20 +0100, max
<max(a)koehler-kn.de> wrote:
I absolutely agree with your point. I wasn't aware that wiki-syntax
inserts in fact <i> tags (and also
<b> tags, which bring up the same
problems). That needs to be changed. We need clean, semantic markup in
order to adjust the styling to any given circumstances, as you perfectly
described.
This sucks, but it can't. The italics and bold weren't always used with
the semantic meaning of giving emphasis (as I mentioned in my previous
e-mail), so blindly replacing them with "semantic" tags and giving them
false meanings would be a step back.
--
Matma Rex
_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
Design(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design