You're right, VE cannot currently does have significant limitations and
people do currently need direct access to the source - and that's why I
was also so opposed to hiding the link to edit the source (I think I
brought it up in the bug comments, but nothing came of that). Using a
popout or similar such obfuscating control for it means that it will be
that much harder for those who do have legitime use/need for the current
interface to actually find and use it in the meantime, and that is a
problem precisely because said interface is needed.
On 21/06/13 21:20, Erik Moeller wrote:
I think there are a couple of important points:
* There are still elements that VE can't edit;
* There are still pages that render incorrectly in VE;
* There are still likely other bugs, roundtrip and performance issues
that will frustrate users.
We do want to eventually get all users to use VE, but we need to be
realistic that at this point we're launching beta software that has
lots of quirks, some known, some unknown. It's awesome already but
there's still a long way to go.
That means power users will have _legitimate_ reasons to want to
continue to use wikitext for some time; it'll be more efficient in
many cases, and sometimes necessary.
I want us to be careful to not message in a way that glosses over such
I'm personally fine with the preference as an option, but we need to
make sure that power users know about it. I can see the concern about
a secondary "edit source" option from a UI cleanliness perspective,
but again, recognizing that VE is still beta and will be for a while,
I think James' argument that this may well be a better way to get
power users to continue experimenting with VE (rather than disabling
it in the preference) has significant merit. It could be deprecated
once VE has built-in source mode switching.
VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation
Design mailing list