As Shahyar said, we're still iterating but there will be a need for a "non-primary" button in many places throughout the UI



Jared Zimmerman  \\  Director of User Experience \\ Wikimedia Foundation               
M : +1 415 609 4043 |   :  @JaredZimmerman



On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Shahyar Ghobadpour <sghobadpour@wikimedia.org> wrote:

A "quieter than normal" button is necessary, I just don't like the current implementation. So, we can't get rid of it just yet.

I have a patch going up for review today with an additional type called sleeper buttons, which are somewhere between normal and quiet.

--Shahyar

On Apr 3, 2014 10:49 AM, "Bartosz Dziewoński" <matma.rex@gmail.com> wrote:
Since no one answered, let me ask a different question – would anyone oppose if I were to remove the .mw-ui-quiet class?

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Bartosz Dziewoński <matma.rex@gmail.com>wrote:

Actually, what is the rationale for having a separate "quiet" style?

The one that seems to be given here seems to be the "inverse Fitts' law"
[1], but I don't really see how just making a button more bland helps with
this.

I'd be all for killing it and sticking to a simpler visual convention,
just using regular (non-colored) buttons where we'd previously try to use
the quiet ones.

[1] http://blog.codinghorror.com/the-opposite-of-fitts-law/

(Resending because something ate the previous one.)

--
Matma Rex

_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
Design@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design

_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
Design@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design