I'd suggest summarising the conversation so far and documenting a proposed
best practice at
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Andre Klapper <aklapper(a)wikimedia.org>wrote;wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 08:51 +0200, Amir E. Aharoni
wrote:
Will it possible to split it to two messages: One
natural, when there's
no
truncation, and one when you have to truncate. Or
is the truncation
completely automatic and you cannot know when it is truncated?
If it's completely automatic and there's no way to have two phrases,
you'll
probably have to separate the "editing"
part to a separate message and
explain it in qqq.
Are there technical reasons why using an ellipsis like
"Long article name which will be trunca... editing"
would not work?
andre
--
Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
Design(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design