Is that not along the lines of what I said? The only difference is that we didn't mention a "leader".
I think there was a misunderstanding... At least from me.
In my idea there was 1 or 2 ProjectS Manager and a leader per project.
The project manager is only taking care everything is going ok,
putting deadlines and so-on. Project leader is leading the project on
a day to day basis. Coordinators are coordinating the projects... 3
level of actions, but this is how it generaly works in company.And
this way of working is pretty efficient (as you give responsabilities
to some people)
On 03/09/07, Casey Brown <cbrown1023.ml@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure if you were there for the meeting where we discussed this, but
> "manager" is basically just an "organizing pusher" for the project, you just
> make deadlines and get people to work (but not push too hard ;-).
>
> On 9/2/07, Mitchell <mduce@mts.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I have listed myself as a potential project manager. Now, how would this
> system work? Would I just add my name to any projects I wish to manage? Or
> would it be voted on at a meeting? Or would it be discussed among those
> interested in the project?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________________
> >
> > Mitch D. (Greeves on all English Wikimedia projects)
> > _______________________________________________
> > ComProj mailing list
> > ComProj@lists.wikimedia.org
> > http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/comproj
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Casey Brown
> Cbrown1023
>
> ---
> Note: This e-mail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails sent
> to
> this address will probably get lost.
> _______________________________________________
> ComProj mailing list
> ComProj@lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/comproj
>
>
--
schiste
_______________________________________________
ComProj mailing list
ComProj@lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/comproj