http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Wikimedia_visual_identity_guidelines states that approval is needed for letterheads and business cards, which seems to imply that casual use of the logo doesn't require approval, nor does anything on that page imply that it is. Additionally, that logo does meet the requirements as far as I can see, 60% black subtext, at 60% of the size of the main text, in DevaVu Sans. (it seems GIMP decided to make it 40%, the attached version corrects this, and if you're referring to the spacing, the version I downloaded didn't have that much spacing, and I interpreted the guideline as stating there should be that much of a margin in printed versions)

On 9/4/07, Guillaume Paumier <guillom.pom@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,

On 9/4/07, Dan Collins < en.wp.st47@gmail.com> wrote:
I believe foundation policy states only that business cards may not be issued without consent, but the logo can be used freely. Attached is such a logo.

Please point me to the policy saying this. Besides, the logo you proposed doesn't follow our visual identity guidelines:
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Wikimedia_visual_identity_guidelines

I don't see the point of having a localized Wikimedia logo for an unofficial workgroup (actually, I don't see the point of having a logo for ComProj at all, but that's another story). You don't need any logo to do good work. Who are the "outsiders" you want to show your logo?

--
Guillaume Paumier
[[m:User:guillom]]
"Go confidently in the direction of your dreams. Live the life you have imagined." Henry David Thoreau
_______________________________________________
ComProj mailing list
ComProj@lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/comproj




--
ST47
Administrator, en.wikipedia