On 9/9/07, Casey Brown <cbrown1023.ml@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/9/07, Gerald A <geraldablists@gmail.com> wrote:
Bring this up at the next meeting, not here. :-)

I'll add it to the agenda, and hopefully make the meeting. :)

> Also, I'm thinking projects should all live in the "project" sub-namespace,
> but there are a few that are just hanging off "CPG". Are these older
> initiatives which are just going to be grandfathered, or should we consider
> moving the few not under projects to the "new" spot?
>
Do you have specific examples right there? (I can't look them up right now.)

Two quick ones:
 No order, they were just adjacent in the list as it is on the page.

I think there are about 6 listed projects that aren't under the "Projects/" page directly,
but simply hanging off of the CPG page. For consistency and clarity, I think it would
be better if they all had the "Projects/" prefix.

Thanks,
Gerald.