Hi,<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/4/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Dan Collins</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:en.wp.st47@gmail.com">en.wp.st47@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<a href="http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Wikimedia_visual_identity_guidelines" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Wikimedia_visual_identity_guidelines
</a> states that approval is needed for letterheads and business cards, which seems to imply that casual use of the logo doesn&#39;t require approval, nor does anything on that page imply that it is. </blockquote><div><br>
&quot;Note that no derivative of the Wikimedia logo can be published without prior approval from the Foundation.&quot; <br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Additionally, that logo does meet the requirements as far as I can see, 60% black subtext, at 60% of the size of the main text, in DevaVu Sans. (it seems GIMP decided to make it 40%, the attached version corrects this, and if you&#39;re referring to the spacing, the version I downloaded didn&#39;t have that much spacing, and I interpreted the guideline as stating there should be that much of a margin in printed versions)
</blockquote><div><br>I was referring to the subtext.<br><br>Again, I don&#39;t understand why Comproj (an informal unofficial group of users) wants to look like an official branch of the Wikimedia Foundation.<br clear="all">
</div></div><br>-- <br>Guillaume Paumier<br>[[m:User:guillom]]<br>"Go confidently in the direction of your dreams. Live the life you have imagined." Henry David Thoreau