for such a tool to include/anticipate the need for
structured data on
Commons, or default to filling in Depicts and/or other structure data
fields. Building more tools which generate categories by default would
definitely be a bit counter-productive (and hard on multilingual
contributors). One option, might be designing such a tool to work with
Artworks and other unique objects (like photographs) already on Wikidata,
and then have it prepared to hook up with the Wikibase/Structured data
features that will go live on Commons in the fall.
Cheers,
Alex
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Asaf Bartov <abartov(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Absolutely; I wanted to know if such a tool perhaps
already exists. If one
does not, then definitely, if we develop a tool, it should look to the
future and be based on Structured Data on Commons already!
A.
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 8:54 PM Yaroslav Blanter <ymbalt(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think it is pretty similar to what we have
built in Wikidata, Do
Structured Commons folks want to comment?
Cheers
Yaroslav
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 7:47 PM, Asaf Bartov <abartov(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
> Hi, folks.
>
> It occurs to me there are tens or hundreds of thousands of images
donated
en masse
(GLAM etc.) that are only categorized as "image from X
collection"
or "Files donated by X", i.e.
essentially uncategorized by content.
This obviously greatly reduces the likelihood of discoverability and
re-use. But it's hard to find such files, and the massive categories
(thousands of files, often) don't make organizing the work easy.
I'm think of a gamified interface -- à la Wikidata Game -- that would
let a
volunteer (after OAuth identification) pick a
category (from a pre-fed
list
of massive categories of donated files) and show
one photo from the
category that has only that category listed (i.e. has no categorization
by
content), and let the volunteer type (with
auto-complete, like HotCat)
some
appropriate categories and hit Save, and the
categories would be added,
and
> the next file shown.
>
> (Optionally, a second layer of verification could be added, where
> volunteers would [also] be invited to vet or change previous
volunteers'
categorization, and actual change to categories on Commons would only
take
> place after 2 (or N) users approved the categories. I'm not at all
sure
> this is needed, and I think we can start
without it and see how it
goes.)
So, does something like this exist? If not, who wants to build it? :)
A.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
Alex Stinson
GLAM-Wiki Strategist
Wikimedia Foundation
Twitter:@glamwiki/@sadads
Learn more about how the communities behind Wikipedia, Wikidata and other
Wikimedia projects partner with cultural heritage organizations: