Ok, how is that not pretty much exactly the same as atomic/tag-like categorization? Yeah yeah , i get it you propose to have the user add categories in a subst- template like fashion, but that is just a "convenience", the end-result is atomic categorization. Uhm... ...I'm all for it :-). And as we all know built in category intersection is (just like Duke Nukem Forever and Nuclear Fusion) juuuuust about to happen ;-). -- [[en:User:Dschwen]] [[de:Benutzer:Dschwen]] [[commons:User:Dschwen]]

I don't quite see how that should work, since you are substing categories for incategory to work. I would advise against doing this for now, as you'd be essentially "polluting" the category tree. There have been longstanding debates on this issue. If atomic categorization were to be decided upon (and it is still controvesially discussed) I'm sure we want a propper solution rather than the hack you are proposing. It is tempting to just try to get something started, but with a massive system like commons categories and without large community backing your effort is likely to be a damp squib, causing just a maintenance nuisance when we have to clean it up. Again: me likes atomic categorization, but please with community consensus and a proper implementation. -- [[en:User:Dschwen]] [[de:Benutzer:Dschwen]] [[commons:User:Dschwen]]