2009/6/19 Daniel Schwen
<lists@schwen.de>
> I posted into a Commons user sandbox: User:Alex brollo/O_Categories a more
> detailed talk about novel use of self-transcluding categories. . I'd like
Ok, how is that not pretty much exactly the same as atomic/tag-like
categorization?
Yeah yeah , i get it you propose to have the user add categories in a subst-
template like fashion, but that is just a "convenience", the end-result is
atomic categorization.
Uhm... ...I'm all for it :-). And as we all know built in category
intersection is (just like Duke Nukem Forever and Nuclear Fusion) juuuuust
about to happen ;-)
Thanks Daniel for your interest.
As usual, I have a strange "do-it-yoursef" approach to this kind of
difficult topics. So I can't guess if/where/how this kind of topic has
been discussed (I saw lots of discussions on categorization, many of them so much exoteric than I can't undestand them; nor I'm interested into extensions development, I have much fun using existing, basic tools) . Nevertheless, in my tryes, such e trick turned out very simple to
use, you can add and remove "axes", "branches" and "leaves" and to
convert a "leaf" (i.e. a "terminal category") into a "branch"... a
couple of more interested comments, and I'll implement just some of
such "catwords" into Commons, just to let you see how they precisely
work.
Alex