2009/6/19 Daniel Schwen <lists(a)schwen.de>
I posted into
a Commons user sandbox: User:Alex brollo/O_Categories a
more
detailed talk about novel use of
self-transcluding categories. . I'd like
Ok, how is that not pretty much exactly the same as atomic/tag-like
categorization?
Yeah yeah , i get it you propose to have the user add categories in a
subst-
template like fashion, but that is just a "convenience", the end-result is
atomic categorization.
Uhm... ...I'm all for it :-). And as we all know built in category
intersection is (just like Duke Nukem Forever and Nuclear Fusion) juuuuust
about to happen ;-)
Thanks Daniel for your interest.
As usual, I have a strange "do-it-yoursef" approach to this kind of
difficult topics. So I can't guess if/where/how this kind of topic has been
discussed (I saw lots of discussions on categorization, many of them so much
exoteric than I can't undestand them; nor I'm interested into extensions
development, I have much fun using existing, basic tools) . Nevertheless, in
my tryes, such e trick turned out very simple to use, you can add and remove
"axes", "branches" and "leaves" and to convert a
"leaf" (i.e. a "terminal
category") into a "branch"... a couple of more interested comments, and
I'll
implement just some of such "catwords" into Commons, just to let you see how
they precisely work.
Alex