Op 16 mei 2011 22:53 schreef "Tobias Oelgarte" <
tobias.oelgarte(a)googlemail.com> het volgende:
action done without consent (like Jimbo did before) is offensive against
the community, making her mistrusting the WMF, that interferes with
Your analogy is misplaced.
The controversy started because of jimbo acting with his authority. That
analogy would be appropriate if neil would have threatened or had taken
steps against reverting his actions, which he clearly did not.
You seem to think that every action needs to be backed up by a discussion on
beforehand. This is in fact not how a wiki works.