I posted into a Commons user sandbox: User:Alex brollo/O_Categories a more detailed talk about novel use of self-transcluding categories. . I&#39;d like to have a try into Commons, but I need some feedback from you. I don&#39;t want to waste Commons Category: namespace without a sound reason. ;-) <br>
<br>Alex<br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/5/14 Alex Brollo <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:alex.brollo@gmail.com">alex.brollo@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I&#39;m presently discussing into it.source an idea to use categories in a new way, with an &quot;ontology-like&quot; approach that allows a much more effective use of +incategory (category intersection) and multi-axial categorization. As a pathologist, I&#39;d like to test this approach in [[Category:Pathology]]  and [[Category:Histopathology]] fields, merging them. Nothing will be changed, but creation of a limited number of new &quot;keyword-like&quot; categories, with some simple tranclusion trick inside their code, and use of them into image pages, nor there&#39;s any need of any extension or special code. <br>

<br>My question is: have I to discuss here a little more this project, or is it better to implement boldly a limited example of my idea, to discuss it on with a running example? <br clear="all"><br>-- <br><font color="#888888">Alex<br>

</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Alex<br>