Am 17.05.2011 18:16, schrieb Gnangarra:I don't want your opinion censored. But neither i want the opinion of other to be censored as well. Having an opinion and using it suppress the opinion of other is a different story.
On 18 May 2011 00:03, Tobias Oelgarte <tobias.oelgarte@googlemail.com> wrote:
Laws are the one thing, liberty without harm to others the other thing. You can't jump from a plane that is used for suicide, but you can look away if you don't like to see an image. Absolutely not appreciated, strong wording comparison.
And when people look away they very rarely look back, so what comparison do you want denial of liberty is denial of liberty, you chose the words you choose to argue its censorship and liberty, why should I not be able to express my opinion surely you dont want to see me censored and my liberty denied
Am 17.05.2011 17:56, schrieb Gnangarra:_______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list
On 17 May 2011 19:05, Tobias Oelgarte <tobias.oelgarte@googlemail.com> wrote:While we are at it
If we buy this contributions with a loss of liberty. Then yes. Nothing is as worthy as liberty.
do appreciate the denial of liberty for people who break the law?
do you appreciate the denial of liberty at airports that prevent your plane being bombed?
--
GN.
Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
Gn. Blogg: http://gnangarra.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
--
GN.
Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
Gn. Blogg: http://gnangarra.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l