On 23/01/2008, Rama Rama ramaneko@gmail.com wrote:
Hence, with a very little concession to the standard to which professional photographers are accustomed,
Accustomed to what appears to be a non standard practice?
Yes, who in the world would do that, apart the BBC,
BBC credits AP and getty
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_pictures/7204570.stm
CNN,
Nope mostly credit Getty and AP
the Times
nope http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/premier_league/arsenal/artic...
, the Washington Post,
At last one that actually does so.
and bleeding everybody ?
How many counter examples do I have to provide
The problem is that we are making the project in the real world and thus have to understand that by allowing instance on Mr doe we also end up having to allow mr wetriffs.com.
We don't *have* to do anything.
You start offering caption guarantees and we will
And how would that be a problem ?
Generally it is not considered a good idea to advertise porn sites in your image captions. "Prussian Blue courtesy of all Jews should hang inc" isn't even going to be legal in quite a number of countries.