On 2/27/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 27/02/07, Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell@gmail.com wrote:
It's also the case that GFDL + CC-by-nc-nd is generally considered to be a sign of license confusion.
Yeah. I'm talking about some stuff that's already CC-by-nc-nd. Quote: "Oh, it should be fine, it's all Creative Commons!" Thus proving Stallman right. Gah. I'm hoping getting them to GFDL it as well will sound good to them.
Perhaps I'll make up a custom tag ...
It's a constant problem for us. :( And the offence.. "I already gave it to you with the CreativeCommons license, what more do you greedy vultures want?!" ;)
If only someone close to Wikimedia were on the Creative Commons Board (http://creativecommons.org/about/people) so that we'd have a way to encourage them to stop Creating Confusion.... ;)