Hoi,
No Fae, your argument is centred around the notion that copyrights exist even when they do not. The Israeli example is well known in this list and the Israeli government insists that it claims to copyright.

Your argument fails as copyright is claimed to exist by the insistence on providing a license when the basic fact of that copyright is denied by the "owner" of that copyright.. In the case of the Israeli government it is a law defining body who says so.
Thanks,
     GerardM



On 26 June 2014 10:42, Fæ <faewik@gmail.com> wrote:
On 26 June 2014 07:02, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hoi,
> The operational word in your mail is "copyright holder". When the party or
> parties who you INSIST have a copyright deny that they do like the Israeli
> government does, your whole argument becomes a puddle.
> Thanks,
>      GerardM

Gerard,

I have said nothing about the Israeli government, neither has anyone
else in this thread.

Your chosen wording ("you INSIST") makes it appear like I have said
something, somewhere, against the Israeli government. Please provide a
diff or kindly stop trolling by posting chaff like this. You have a
significant track record over the last two months of making completely
unnecessary aggressive personal comments about me on Wikimedia-L, and
now you have followed me to this list. Stop.

Fae
--
faewik@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae

_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l