its more legal/copyright descriptive, that necessitates the wording than just release them to the public which can still indicate they have restrictions


On 16 December 2013 11:46, Robinson Tryon <bishop.robinson@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada
<emijrp@gmail.com> wrote:
> Quote from full announcement
> http://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/digital-scholarship/2013/12/a-million-first-steps.html
>
>> We have released over a million images onto Flickr Commons for anyone to
>> use, remix and repurpose. These images were taken from the pages of 17th,
>> 18th and 19th century books digitised by Microsoft who then generously
>> gifted the scanned images to us, allowing us to release them back into the
>> Public Domain.

The language used here confuses me. Given the age of the source
material and the lack of originality in a simple page-scan, wouldn't
the resulting images already be PD?  Perhaps "release them back into
the Public Domain," would be better described as "release them to the
public" ?

--R

_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l



--
GN.
Vice President Wikimedia Australia
WMAU: http://www.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/User:Gnangarra
Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com