On 12/08/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Matthew Brown</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:morven@gmail.com">morven@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I just love the way that 21 users can vote to make a de-adminship<br>policy without notifying any of the users concerned, including AFAIK<br>on here.&nbsp;&nbsp;Nonsense like this only makes those more active on other<br>projects tempted to only contribute to those projects and not Commons.
<br><br>-Matt<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Commons-l mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org">Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l">
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l</a><br></blockquote></div><br>Deadminship also happens on Meta-Wiki (see <a href="http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Administrators#Policy_for_de-adminship">http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Administrators#Policy_for_de-adminship
</a>). As far as I know, no one is told their status is being voted on. When someone becomes an admin, they should understand that inactivity will mean removal of rights.<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Alex (Majorly)