And ofcourse don't forget these:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikipedia_Takes_Manhattan
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikiportrait
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikipedia_Loves_Art
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Art_Netherlands
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2010
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Images_from_Wiki_takes_Haarlem
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2011
* etc.


See also the related categories [1] and project pages [2]

--
Krinkle

[1] http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Photo_scavenger_hunts
[2] http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Photo_scavenger_hunts

2011/2/24 geni <geniice@gmail.com>
On 23 February 2011 17:40, Paul Houle <paul@ontology2.com> wrote:
>     If you wanted to encourage a 'game mechanic' in Commons,  I think
> you'd want to make it first of all a friendly competition to 'catch them
> all' and secondarily a competition to get better quality photographs.  I
> think the ideal Commons photographer would be a person who's interested
> in some specific category (say going to concerts and snapping pictures
> of musicians or taking pictures of birds.)  To support this there's a
> need for tools that make it clear where the holes are,  both in the
> sense of "We don't have any pictures of X" or "We'd like to get better
> pictures of X".

Problem is that this is in practice a far better fit for wikipedia
where such lists are generated in passing than commons.

For example:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_History_of_the_World_in_100_Objects#Objects
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GLAM/BM/Photos_requested#A_History_of_the_World_in_100_Objects
--
geni

_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l