On 15/09/06, Fastfission <fastfission(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not sure a large and free-form table is the best way to accomplish
this. I think it will confuse people. I think perhaps though that if
we agree on certain issues (say, the architecture one), we could make
specific templates relating just to those instances. They should be
relatively limited in scope.
There do seem to be a small number of recurring issues in this regard:
- public art
- architecture (= derivative works? freedom of panorama?)
(in some, maybe all, countries these are considered together?)
-limits of PD-ineligible (notably, German logos)
-privacy rights
-possibly 'sweat of brow' vs 'mechanical copy'? (we are still
inconsistent about this, with flags)
-and if we're going to go down this route, many countries probably
have laws about offensive/seditious material?
Brianna